Page 16 - CLT061421
P. 16

16  ■  JUNE 14, 2021                           NEWS

        ■ From HOW PULLMAN’S on PAGE 15                    extremely beneficial for both me and my clients,
        types, like hotels, restaurants, banquet facilities,  many of whom are in different states.
        long-term care facilities and retail, as they deter-  We are not spending nearly as much time or re-
        mine the values/assessments later this year.       sources traveling to the courthouses and waiting to
          CLT: How has the global health pandemic—in- be seen by the various judges and all of our files are
        cluding court closures—affected your practice? And  at our fingertips, which has been beneficial in re-
        please be specific.                                solving some matters on remote pretrials.
          Cardillo: In addition to the pandemic adverse-      In terms of convenience, one of my clients logged
        ly impacting the values of certain commercial  on to watch my appellate court argument in his case
        property types, it also has been an adjustment to  while eating his lunch on his deck in Ohio.
        attend all court proceedings and depositions re-      I haven’t had a remote trial, and I am not sure if I
        motely.                                            would want to conduct a trial over Microsoft Teams
          The courts, understandably so, got off to a slow  or Zoom, but I will continue to adapt and be flexible
        start as they recalibrated their operations after their  as necessary.                              ■
        sudden closures.
          But we have since got into a good groove. And at- Robert Storace covers legal trends, lawsuits and
        tending routine status conferences and pretrials, as  analysis for the Connecticut Law Tribune. Follow
        well as depositions, oral arguments and local hear- him on Twitter @RobertSCTLaw or reach him at
        ings, from the convenience of my office has been  203-437-5950.




               Kathleen Arberg Ends Long Run as US


              Supreme Court’s Public Voice and Face



                                                  By Marcia Coyle

            or 38 years, Kathleen Arberg, the U.S.                     interview has been edited lightly for
            Supreme Court’s public information                         length and clarity.
       Fofficer, has had an inside view of the                           ALM: Has the office’s relationship or
        marble palace. Through the pandemic, an                        contact with the public changed in any
        anthrax-related evacuation, the Sept. 11                       way over the years?
        attacks, justices’ deaths and new arrivals                       Arberg: When I began working at the
        after confirmations, Arberg has been a                         court in 1982, public information was
        face and voice for the court.                                  available one way: upon request. The
          Arberg is retiring July 3 after 22 years                     office phone had no “hold” button and
        as the high court’s top spokesperson.                          rang incessantly. Letters arrived daily in
        Before she held that role, she was an        Kathy Arberg.     large bales. There were no security gates.
        assistant PIO at the court for 17 years.  Credit: Collection of the   Visitors roamed in and out of the office,
        Unflappable and thoughtful in her deal-  Supreme Court of the   often browsing through books on our
        ings with news reporters, Arberg was        United States.     office shelves. Basic information now
        only the fifth person to serve as public information  available on the court’s website was provided repeat-
        officer since the office was established in 1935.  edly over the phone: spelling all the justices’ names,
          She recently shared her thoughts about the  painstakingly taking down addresses over the phone
        changes she has witnessed during her tenure. The  to mail information and opinions, reading the court’s

        CONNECTICUT
           Law Tribune
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21