Page 15 - CLT060721
P. 15

NEWS                                     JUNE 7, 2021  ■  15
        typically include injunctions, restitution orders and  before the emergency declaration—for example, if a
        civil  penalties.  Some  states  also specify criminal  temporary discount period was scheduled to end on
        charges for willful acts of price gouging.         a specified date—it is crucial to keep records showing
          Last month’s pipeline shutdown had a sharp  that the increase was planned before an emergency
        impact on gasoline supply and prices charged by  declaration went into effect. If it is possible to de-
        retailers. The demand for gasoline nationwide rose  lay the price increase, and thus extend a discount
        by 20% the following week and by 40.1% in Florida,  period, the long-term goodwill to be gained may
        Georgia, the Carolinas and Virginia. Local gasoline  outweigh the additional short-term revenue from a
        shortages occurred also. For example, 70% of gas  higher price.
        stations in Charlotte, North Carolina, were report-   Businesses should also think twice about rais-
        edly out of fuel by May 12. Average gasoline prices  ing prices, particularly for essential goods, merely
        increased nationwide by 6 cents per gallon, and by  because it appears the market will bear temporary
        15 cents per gallon in Michigan.                   emergency-related increases. If such price increases
          In addition, there were many anecdotal reports of  exceed the threshold set by state law and are not due
        extreme price increases at gas stations, giving rise to  solely to cost increases, the business will be suscep-
        concerns about price gouging. For example, one gas  tible to charges of price gouging. This can have legal
        station in Richmond, Virginia, reportedly charged  consequences and also negatively impact goodwill.
        $6.99 per gallon, despite an average price in that    Relatedly, the pipeline shutdown also reminds
        area of $2.83 per gallon. In North Carolina, the state  us of what companies can do if they believe they
        attorney general’s office announced 39 complaints of  are victims of price gouging by their suppliers.
        price gouging.                                     Businesses can file complaints with their state At-
          It bears emphasis, however, that these gasoline  torney General’s Office, which can often be done
        price increases did not necessarily indicate price  by telephone. They can also send cease-and-desist
        gouging. For example, price hikes on the order of  letters to their suppliers that identify the products
        even 15 cents per gallon—roughly 6%—would not  and prices in question, explain that price gouging
        likely be considered price gouging under any cur- is illegal, and demand that prices revert to reason-
        rent state law. The same is true for even larger price  able  or  pre-emergency  market  levels.  If  a  private
        spikes if they were rooted in cost increases the seller  right of action is available under the state’s unfair
        passed on to the consumer. In contrast, doubling  trade practices law, businesses can file lawsuits for
        the price per gallon, particularly if other sellers in  injunctive relief and damages, in addition to refer-
        the same area did not do so, would tend to indicate  ring the price gouging to state authorities. For large
        price gouging because the price increases presum- companies, it may be effective to submit complaints
        ably were not caused by increased costs to the seller. to their state legislators or members of Congress,
          The  pipeline  shutdown  and  its  attendant price  who are typically eager to publicize and investigate
        increases  provide  several  key reminders for  com- price gougers.
        panies. Most importantly, businesses that consider    Ultimately, consumer-facing companies should
        raising prices for goods during an emergency, par- heed the lessons of the East Coast pipeline shut-
        ticularly while emergency declarations are still in  down. They should take the time to examine their
        effect, should bear in mind that they may be vulner- states’ laws and ensure their own compliance or take
        able to complaints of price gouging. Although state  action if they themselves were victimized by price
        laws differ, it is advisable to raise prices—if at all— gouging.                                    ■
        only to the extent necessary to offset increased costs
        of production or distribution. Such increases often  Jason A. Levine is a business litigation and antitrust
        fall within safe harbors in price-gouging laws.    partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Alston &
          Further, any such cost increases should be doc- Bird. He has advised many clients on price-gouging
        umented in detail. If a price increase was planned  issues.
                                                                                                  CONNECTICUT
                                                                                                  Law Tribune
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20