Page 49 - CLT102620
P. 49

CLOSING ARGUMENT                                           OCTOBER 26, 2020 ¦ 49

                                   EDITORIAL BOARD

Trial Docket where the thorni-                                 means there is no way for the
est custody cases are tried;                                   press to cover a matter without
complex litigation; and other                                  pre-alerting the judicial branch.
less enviable but most impor-                                  The public has theoretical access
tant assignments in juvenile                                   to the open courthouses. How-
and family courts. On a call                                   ever, beyond level one matters
with bar leaders, the judicial        Connecticut’s current    they will not be able to see and
administration praised JTRs           administration must      observe proceedings. If the judi-
who are working without com-       address the constitutional  cial branch has devised a system

pensation. This cheapens the rights of defendants to a of access for the public to all
entire judiciary and is a cynical  speedy trial.               court proceedings, in person or
approach to judicial adminis-                                  virtual, it is not apparent on its
tration.                                                       website.
Seven months since this                                        No member of the public
pandemic began, this adminis-                                  who wants to visit court will be
tration is no closer to providing                              able to navigate their way to en-
leadership regarding the future                                joy that constitutional right. We
of the criminal jury trial than it was on day one. are well advised that there are significant con-
It must address the constitutional rights of defen- cerns about live-streaming all court proceedings
dants to a speedy trial. The COVID-19 Federal on the judicial branch’s Youtube channel, where
Judicial Task Force published a guide on June 4, litigants would lose their practical anonymity,
entitled “Conducting Jury Trials and Convening exposing their conflict to those who should be
Grand Juris During the Pandemic”. That was four sheltered from it (with particularity, tech savvy
months ago. There has been no public statement children, or their classmates of divorcing par-
from our state court system that would provide ents). Several states live-stream all of their court
similar guidance.                  hearings. This administration must make clear
An examination of the judicial branch website to the public its plan to ensure the public’s access
discloses little information on public access to to the courts. Perhaps they have, but the solution
virtual proceedings. Regarding criminal matters, is nowhere to be found online. This should be
the press can have a single pooled reporter, which remedied immediately.
                                                                                              ¦

Build your case with con?dence

Access 200,000+ verdicts and settlements.

THE leading verdict search platform, including:
• 200,000+ Cases Updated Daily
• National & State Coverage
• Both Plaintiff & Defense Case-Winning Information
Knowing how the rest of the country is handling claims can save your company time and money.
Research unique case-winning information, just one click away!

   Activate your FREE TRIAL today at www.verdictsearch.com/free-trial

                                                                                              CONNECTICUT
                                                                                               Law Tribune
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52