Page 31 - CLT032320
P. 31

CONNECTICUT OPINIONS                                MARCH 23, 2020 ¦ 31

APPELLATE COURT                                    and her limbs appeared 1.5 miles away from
                                                   defendant’s home. Defendant stated to an ac-
                                                   quaintance before his girlfriend disappeared
                                                   that he knew how to get rid of someone. On
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW                                 appeal, defendant claimed the state failed to

Court Affirmed Judgment for                        prove the manner, means, place, cause, and
                                                   time of death. He also claimed the lower court
Defendant In Lawsuit Brought by                    erroneously instructed the jury by failing to
an Incarcerated Inmate Claiming                    give a special credibility instruction. The court
Defendant Acted In Retaliation                     affirmed the conviction. The court first found
                                                   the evidence was sufficient to support a mur-
CASE: Jolley v. Vinton                             der conviction. It reasoned the jury could have
COURT: Connecticut Appellate Court                 reasonably inferred that the defendant intend-
DOC. NO.: AC 41989                                 ed, and did cause, the victim’s death; there
COURT OPINION BY: Devlin                           was evidence that he was domineering and
DATE: March 10, 2020 • PAGES: 6                    controlling, he had choked her a month be-
                                                   fore she disappeared, the victim had expressed
Plaintiff, who was self-represented and incar-     her desire to end the relationship, she had last
cerated, sued defendant, a former state cor-       been seen alive at his house, and the interior
rectional institution administrative captain,      of the defendant’s car was detailed shortly
claiming violations of his federal constitution-   after the victim’s disappearance. The court
al rights. Plaintiff claimed defendant retaliated  then determined that the trial court did not
against him for providing legal advice to fel-     err in failing to provide a special credibility
low inmates by ordering a search of plaintiff ’s   instruction. It found that the witness at issue
cell, the seizure of items from his cell, and the  did not fall into any of the three categories
removal of plaintiff ’s job at the prison’s gym.   of witnesses that required such an instruction,
The trial court rendered judgment in favor         and the court gave multiple other credibility
of defendant, finding plaintiff failed to prove    instructions. Lastly, the court found that the
that he was engaged in an activity protected by    defendant’s right to due process was not vio-
the first amendment and that there was in any      lated after the state tried him for a third time
causal connection between his alleged protect-     following two previous mistrials. The court
ed conduct and defendant’s alleged retaliatory     affirmed the conviction.
acts. Plaintiff appealed and the court affirmed.
The court held that the trial court correctly de-
termined plaintiff failed to prove a causal con-   REAL ESTATE • CIVIL PROCEDURE

nection. There was no evidence of a retaliatory    Court Dismissed Defendant’s Appeal
motive based on defendant’s testimony, which
the court found credible, and there was suffi- In Foreclosure Litigation For Lack Of
cient evidence to prove that defendant’s actions   Subject Matter Jurisdiction
were based on legitimate motives. The court
affirmed the lower court’s ruling.                 CASE: The Office Condo. Ass’n v. Rompre
                                                   COURT: Connecticut Appellate Court
                                                   DOC. NO.: AC 41458
CRIMINAL APPEALS                                   COURT OPINION BY: DiPentima

Court Affirmed Defendant’s Murder                  DATE: March 10, 2020 • PAGES: 7

                                                   Plaintiff sought to foreclose a statutory lien
Conviction, Finding Sufficient Evidence            for unpaid common charges on a condo unit
to Support It                                      owned by defendant. Defendant filed a coun-
                                                   terclaim. The trial court granted defendant’s
                                                   motion for summary judgment on the fore-
CASE: State of Connecticut v. Richards             closure complaint and defendant amended
COURT: Connecticut Appellate Court                 her counterclaim to add counts of vexatious
DOC. NO.: AC 43140
COURT OPINION BY: Bishop                           litigation and slander of title. Plaintiff filed
DATE: March 10, 2020 • PAGES: 19                   a motion for summary judgment, which the
Defendant was convicted of murder and court granted except as to attorney fees. De-
appealed. Defendant’s girlfriend went missing fendant appealed and the court dismissed the

                                                                                            CONNECTICUT
                                                                                             Law Tribune
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36