Page 17 - CLT010421
P. 17

NEWS                                            JANUARY 4, 2021 ¦ 17

A Connecticut federal                                              of serious harm to an inmate and
judge  granted summary judg-                                       disregarded it,” he said.
ment to seven of the defendants,                                   In  Tangreti’s lawsuit, Menashi
but denied Bachmann qualified                                      found that the pretrial record did
immunity protections on the            The ruling held there       not “support the inference” that
grounds that she was “conceiv-        was no special test for      Bachmann had known or disre-
ably personally involved” in the   supervisory liability in light  garded an excessive risk to the
abuses.                              of a 2009 U.S. Supreme        inmate’s health or safety. At most,
                                   Court decision in “Ashcroft     he said, Bachmann “could have or
  Bachmann, who oversaw the                                        should have made an inference of
day-to-day operations of a prison             v. Iqbal.”

substance abuse program, said                                      the risk of sexual abuse.”
that she had witnessed inap-                                       Bachmann, Menashi said,
propriate interactions between                                     made that connection at the end
Tangreti and the guards, and re-                                   of October, and was entitled to
ported emotional changes in the woman while the qualified immunity absent a showing that she was
abuse was occurring. She denied having any per- “subjectively aware of the risk.”
sonal knowledge of sexual abuse until one of the “Contrary to the district court’s conclusion, it is
guards confessed in October 2014.              not enough for Tangreti to show that Bachmann
In his ruling, Menashi said that the Supreme was negligent, or even grossly negligent, in her su-
Court’s decision in Iqbal had “cast doubt on the pervision of the correctional officers or in failing to
continued viability of the special standards for act on the information she had,” the judge wrote.
supervisory liability.” Circuit courts, Menashi Menashi was joined in the ruling by Second
said, have since struggled to parse Iqbal‘s  effect Circuit Judge John M. Walker Jr. The panel’s third
on civil rights litigation, with some holding that member, Ralph K. Winter, died Dec. 8, before the
there was simply “no special rule of liability for ruling was issued. Both Walker and Menashi were
supervisors.”                                  in agreement in deciding the matter.
“We join these circuits in holding that after Iqbal, Ponvert did not immediately respond Monday to
there is no special rule for supervisory liability,” a request for comment.
Menashi wrote.                                 The case was captioned Tangreti v. Bachmann. ¦
“For deliberate-indifference claims under the
Eighth Amendment against a prison supervisor, Tom McParland of New York Law Journal can be
the plaintiff must plead and prove that the supervi- contacted at [email protected]. Follow him on
sor had subjective knowledge of a substantial risk Twitter @TMcParlandALM.

IN WHAT PRACTICES ARE YOUR COMPETITORS GROWING?

          Ask Legal Compass: at.alm.com/legalcompass

                                                                                     CONNECTICUT
                                                                                      Law Tribune
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22