District Court
MEMORANDA AND ORDERS
DECEMBER 17, 2024
BY SCOTT, J.
Needham v. Covanta Energy, LLC et al; 22-3392; For the
forgoing reasons, Defendants� motion for summary judgment is granted with
respect to Plaintiff�s gender discrimination and hostile work environment
claims. Defendants� motion for summary judgment is denied for Plaintiff�s
retaliation claim.
BY SCOTT, J.
Willingham v. Boyer; 24-6052; The Court will permit
Willingham an opportunity to file an amended complaint to fully set forth all
the facts that form the basis of the claim he seeks to present.
BY BAYLSON, J.
Zuber v. Republic First Bancorp Inc.; 23-991; For the reasons stated above, Defendant�s Motion for Summary
Judgment is DENIED.
BY STRAW, J.
Charles R. v. Colvin; 23-3256; The ALJ failed to perform
a consistency analysis for Dr. Goodyear�s medical opinions, rejected the
environmental limitation after finding it was supported by Dr. Goodyear�s
evaluation, and failed to explain why the work preclusive environmental limitation
was rejected. Accordingly, I find that remand is warranted.
BY BEETLESTONE, J.
Brahm v. County of Chester et
al; 23-3848; For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment will be entered in
favor of all Defendants on Brahm�s claims for
deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition. The remainder of Brahm�s claims will be dismissed without prejudice for
failure to state a claim.
BY SLOMSKY, J.
Miller v. Trans Union, LLC et al; 24-3047; For these reasons, Defendant Midland�s Motion to Dismiss the
Complaint (Doc. No. 17) will be granted.