District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

DECEMBER 17, 2024

BY SCOTT, J.

Needham v. Covanta Energy, LLC et al; 22-3392; For the forgoing reasons, Defendants� motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Plaintiff�s gender discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Defendants� motion for summary judgment is denied for Plaintiff�s retaliation claim.

BY SCOTT, J.

Willingham v. Boyer; 24-6052; The Court will permit Willingham an opportunity to file an amended complaint to fully set forth all the facts that form the basis of the claim he seeks to present.

BY BAYLSON, J.

Zuber v. Republic First Bancorp Inc.; 23-991; For the reasons stated above, Defendant�s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

BY STRAW, J.

Charles R. v. Colvin; 23-3256; The ALJ failed to perform a consistency analysis for Dr. Goodyear�s medical opinions, rejected the environmental limitation after finding it was supported by Dr. Goodyear�s evaluation, and failed to explain why the work preclusive environmental limitation was rejected. Accordingly, I find that remand is warranted.

BY BEETLESTONE, J.

Brahm v. County of Chester et al; 23-3848; For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment will be entered in favor of all Defendants on Brahm�s claims for deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition. The remainder of Brahm�s claims will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim.

BY SLOMSKY, J.

Miller v. Trans Union, LLC et al; 24-3047; For these reasons, Defendant Midland�s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. No. 17) will be granted.