District Court
MEMORANDA AND ORDERS
DECEMBER 03, 2024
BY RUFE, J.
Bistrian v. Warden Troy Levi et
al; 08-3010; The Court is satisfied that this award has provided reasonable
compensation to Bistrian�s attorneys for their work
completed in response to the United States� flagrant errors and omissions
throughout this litigation.
BY RUFE, J.
In re: Clobetasol Cases
(End-Payer); 16-27242; EPPs� motions to partially exclude the opinions of Dr.
James Hughes, Dr. Erin Trish, and Dr. Laura Happe are
GRANTED.
BY RUFE, J.
In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust
Litigation; 16-2724; EPPs� motions to partially exclude the opinions of Dr.
James Hughes, Dr. Erin Trish, and Dr. Laura Happe are
GRANTED.
BY MCHUGH, J.
USA v. Singleton et al; 11-076; Finally, Mr. Singleton
argues that counsel should have objected that the Court�s finding of a �six-level
enhancement� was invalid, having never been submitted to a jury. Two separate
six-level enhancements figured in the guideline calculations, and petitioner is
unclear as to which he challenges.
BY SLOMSKY, J.
USA v. Ford; 23-130; For the
foregoing reasons, Defendant�s Motion to Revoke Pretrial Detention (Doc. No.
34) will be denied.
BY SLOMSKY, J.
Levin v. Silverberg et al; 24-4898; Accordingly,
for all these reasons, Defendants� Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 9) will
be denied. The Motion to Amend Notice of Removal, which is part of the Reply in
Support of the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 11), will be denied.
BY WOLSON, J.
Okildzhon Zade
et al v. United States et al; 23-2344; For the reasons
stated above, I will approve the Petitions To Approve The Settlement And
Distribution.
BY BARTLE, J.
Easterling v. County of
Delaware; 23-5016; The motion of Delaware County for
summary judgment on plaintiff�s claim for retaliation under the FMLA will be
denied.
BY GALLAGHER, J.
Giammarinaro v. Northampton
County et al; 23-4086; Whether the members of a jury will find for Plaintiff is
a question for another day, but on this record, there is sufficient evidence to
permit him to bring his claims before them. For the foregoing reasons,
Defendants Riley, Neff, Marino, and Volpe�s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 44) is denied.
BY YOUNGE, J.
Ferretti v. Emrick et al;
24-2865; Ferretti�s claims that Emrick and Genovese
sexually assaulted him, and his claim that Emrick
violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act will be served for a responsive
pleading. The balance of Ferretti�s claim will be dismissed with prejudice
since he has already had an opportunity to amend and further amendment would be
futile.