District Court

 

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

DECEMBER 22, 2022

BY McHUGH, J.

USA v. Goldner; 15-0002; Given the totality of

circumstances, it would be singularly inequitable to permit Mr. Goldner

to avoid responsibility for his conduct.

Govan v. Amazon, Inc.; 22-4403; For the foregoing

reasons, the Court will grant Mr. Govan leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. �

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim.

BY PRATTER, J.

USA v. Nikparvar-Fard et al.; 18-0101; For the

foregoing reasons, the Court will deny Dr. Nikparvar-Fard�s motion for

reconsideration.

BY GOLDBERG, J.

Moskowitz Family LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc.; 20-

3271; In light of the foregoing, I will grant summary judgment in favor

of Defendant with respect to Plaintiff�s direct infringement claims

relating to the �913 patent and the �022 patent.

BY SAVAGE, J.

Kocher v. Wilkie; 21-0921; Therefore, we shall

grant the VA�s motion.

Mickman v. Philadelphia Professional Collections,

LLC et al; 21-4221; We shall dismiss Count I (UTPCPL) and Count V (Civil

RICO) on the bases of the statute of limitations, failure to state a

claim, and collateral estoppel.

Delaware River Waterfront Corporation v. The Sage

Group PLC et al; 22-1905; Therefore, we shall grant Sage�s motion to

compel arbitration.

BY SITARSKI, J.

Thomas v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security;

21-3547; For the foregoing reasons, I find that the ALJ erred by failing

to properly consider: (1) the supportability and consistency of Dr.

Tecce�s and Dr. Mandel�s opinions and (2) the subject statements of

Plaintiff himself.

BY MARSTON, J.

Robinson et al v. Pottstown Area Rapid Transit,

Inc. et al; 22-0655; For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies CMD�s

motion for summary judgment.

USA v. Buhl; 88-0490; For the foregoing reasons,

Buhl�s Motion is denied.

BY GALLAGHER, J.

Garcia v. Philadelphia District Attorney Office et

al; 22-3864; For the reasons stated, Garcia will be granted leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and his Complaint will be dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DECEMBER 23, 2022

BY PAPPERT, J.

USA v. Coleman; 15-0543; Under the �sliding-scale�

balancing approach applied to these factors, the �less likely a movant is

to win, the more the other factors must be in his favor� to prevail.