District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

BY PEREZ, J.

USA v. Burnett et al; 11-274; The Court concludes that reimposing the 288-month sentence is sufficient and not greater than necessary to comply with the objectives of sentencing.

BY PAPPERT, J.

Moore v. Giorla et al; 14-3873; If any grounds under Rule 45(d)(3) exist, the Court is required to either quash or modify the subpoena. Moore argues only that the Court should not quash the subpoena.

BY SCOTT, J.

Moore et al v. Independence Blue Cross, LLC; 23-566; The Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2) and the Girsh factors. The Class Representatives and Class Counsel have adequately represented the class.

BY REID, J.

David F. v. O�Malley; 24-2347; In accordance with the above discussion, I conclude that the Plaintiff�s Request for Review should be denied, and judgment entered in favor of the Commissioner.

BY SCHMEHL, J.

Century Surety Company v. Accurate Freight Systems Corp.; 23-4903; For all the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Century�s motion for judgment on the pleadings and orders declaratory relief as detailed in the accompanying Order.

BY SCHMEHL, J.

Kreis v. Smith; 24-3686; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Kreis leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Kreis will be granted leave to file an amended complaint.