District Court
MEMORANDA AND ORDERS
NOVEMBER 05, 2024
BY PEREZ, J.
Brady v. Santander Consumer USA et al; 22-5051; For all the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff has failed to
allege a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, Defendants� motions
to dismiss are granted and the Clerk of Courts is directed to close this matter.
BY PAPPERT, J.
Baez v. Letizio et al; 23-1827;
The Court will allow Baez to amend his First Amendment retaliation claim. He
may do so on or before December 5, 2024.
BY WOLSON, J.
Gunter v. Drexel University; 23-2451; A reasonable jury
could conclude that members of the IA Department, including Mr. Shea, subjected Ms. Gunter to a hostile work environment
following Ms. Bowman�s first verbal warning to Mr. Shea
and that Drexel didn�t do enough to stop it. However, her other claims of
employment discrimination fall short, so Drexel is entitled to summary judgment
on them.
BY WOLSON, J.
Nelson-Cole v. Yakubar et al;
24-4575; Ms. Nelson-Cole�s allegations do not support any factual basis for a
claim under � 1983, so I will dismiss her federal claims with prejudice because
amendment would be futile.
BY MARSTON, J.
Rivera v. CVS Pharmacy; 23-4799; For
the reasons described above, the Court grants CVS�s motion for summary
judgment.
BY SCOTT, J.
Son v. Delaware County et al; 23-5177; For
the foregoing reasons, Defendants� Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) will be
granted and Plaintiff�s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) will be dismissed.
Because the defects in Plaintiff�s pleading cannot be cured through further
amendment, the federal claims in his Amended Complaint will be dismissed with
prejudice.
BY SCOTT, J.
Mancini et al v. Delaware County, PA, et al; 24-2425; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs lack standing.
Defendants� Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs� Amended Complaint (ECF No. 26) will
be granted, and this case will be dismissed.
BY MURPHY, J.
Clark v. Hospital University Pennsylvania et al; 24-2970;
For the foregoing reasons, we grant Penn�s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule
12(b)(1). Ms. Clark�s claims against Hospital of the
University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine Orthopedics, and Betty Alder are
dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
BY BAYLSON, J.
Holmes v. TranSunion, LLC;
24-4433; For the foregoing reasons Defendant�s Motion
to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff�s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
The Clerk shall terminate this case.
BY HEY, J.
Brown et al v. Brooks et al; 23-2966; Although Ms. Kopishke is not a medical doctor, she holds bachelor of
science and master of science degrees in nursing, and a doctor of laws in
health care policy.