District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

NOVEMBER 04, 2024

BY SURRICK, J.

USA v. Pratt; 22-290; For the foregoing reasons, Defendant�s pro se Motion will be denied.

BY PAPPERT, J.

Painadath v. Good Shepherd Penn Partners; 22-3604; The Court will thus dismiss all of Painadath�s Title VII claims against GSPP for failure to bring suit on these claims within ninety days of receiving his NRTS.

BY WOLSON, J.

Purvenas Hayes v. Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky, P.C.; 23-2403; Ms. Purvenas-Hayes shared her vaccine status with SMB outside the confines of a medical inquiry, so she cannot establish her claim under the ADA. Because I am granting summary judgment on this ground, I need not consider SMB�s other arguments.

BY KEARNEY, J.

Williams v. P.A. Parole Board et al; 24-2669; We deny Mr. Williams�s habeas petition and deny a certificate of appealability.

BY KENNEY, J.

McNeal et al v. State Farm Insurance Company et al; 24-3146; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant�s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff�s claim for a violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. � 1981 against all Defendants (Third Cause of Action) will be dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff failed to plead sufficient factual matter to allow the Court to draw the reasonable inference that Defendants are liable for the alleged misconduct, despite opportunities to amend his Complaint or respond appropriately to the Motion to Dismiss.

BY HEY, J.

Brown et al v. Brooks et al; 23-2966; Plaintiffs concede that Penske is entitled to judgment on the claims to the extent they allege recklessness to support punitive damages. Penske is entitled to summary judgment on the negligent entrustment claims.