District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

OCTOBER 29, 2024

BY MARSTON, J.

Rivera v. Luquis et al; 23-4657; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants� motion to partially dismiss will be granted, and the Court will dismiss with prejudice Rivera�s damages claims to the extent they are brought against Defendants Luquis and Coulehan in their official capacities.

BY MARSTON, J.

Acevedo v. District Attorney Office, et al; 24-4265; Acevedo will be given an opportunity to correct the defects in his claims by filing an amended complaint. Any amended complaint must clearly describe the factual basis for his claims and how the defendant was personally involved in the alleged denial of his rights.

BY BAYLSON, J.

Frempong et al v. The Sheriff of Philadelphia et al; 24-1064; For the foregoing reasons, the Sheriff�s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs� Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice because amendment would be futile.

BY BAYLSON, J.

Hedden v. Navy Federal Credit Union; 24-3254; Navy Federal�s motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. This Court hereby DISMISSES with prejudice Count VI.

BY MURPHY, J.

Bass v. Delaware County Domestic Relations et al; 24-3419; For the foregoing reasons, we will grant Mr. Bass leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his complaint. Mr. Bass�s federal claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

BY KEARNEY, J.

Young et al v. Doe; 24-4875; We dismiss Mr. Young�s complaint with prejudice as lacking merit consistent with our Congressionally mandated screening obligations and finding he could not amend to cure his claim absent a change in Pennsylvania sentencing law.

BY BEETLESTONE, J.

Thurmond v. Select Portfolio Servicing (Inc) et al; 24-4986; For the reasons stated, Thurmond�s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and her Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to � 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court concludes that any attempt at amendment would be futile; accordingly, no leave to amend will be granted.

BY SITARSKI, J.

CT Install America, LLC v. Boryszewski et al; 22-4557; For these reasons, the Court awards Plaintiff $7560.00 in fees, representing 25.2 compensable hours of attorney time spent in conjunction with the motion to compel, payable by Mr. Monsour within 60 days.

BY LEESON, JR., J.

Clinchy v. JDL Ventures Corporation et al; 24-464; For the above noted reasons, the Motion for Default Judgment is granted with respect to JDL Ventures and Douglas Beck.