District Court
MEMORANDA AND ORDERS
AUGUST 06, 2024
BY PAPPERT, J.
USA v. Carter; 16-019; Under the
amended Guidelines, Carter receives one rather than two status points, reducing
his total criminal history score to 10. Nevertheless, a score of 10 also places
him in category V, which applies to defendants who receive 10 to 12 criminal
history points and his guideline range remains 210 to 262 months.
BY KEARNEY, J.
Smith v. Salamon, et al;
21-2636; We approve and adopt Judge Hey�s detailed Report and Recommendation. We deny Mr.
Smith�s habeas petition with prejudice, deny an evidentiary hearing, and deny a
certificate of appealability.
Gebre v. Philadelphia Works,
Inc.; 24-987; We grant summary judgment dismissing the
race-based discrimination claim with prejudice. We decline to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction allowing Ms. Gebre to file
suit in state court raising timely claims under Pennsylvania law.
BY SANCHEZ, J.
Bagley v. Upper Darby Township et al; 23-1747; Bagley has
failed to provide any evidence which would allow a reasonable factfinder to
conclude Upper Darby treated him differently than others similarly situated
because he is African American. In the absence of a constitutional violation,
Bagley�s Monell claim necessarily fails. Accordingly,
Upper Darby�s motion for summary judgment will be granted in full.
Stanley v. Little et al; 23-4571; Stanley cannot cure his
procedural default, and because he does not have standing to seek injunctive
relief, the Court concludes amendment would be futile. See Shane v. Fauver, 213 F.3d 113, 115 (3d Cir. 2000). Therefore, the
Court will not grant Stanley leave to amend.
BY BEETLESTONE, J.
Roma v. Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc.; 23-3216; For the
foregoing reasons, Prospect�s Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and
denied in part.
BY GALLAGHER, J.
Harrison-El v. Dr. Doe et al; 23-4725; The
foregoing reasons, Harrison-El�s Motion will be
denied, his AC will be stricken, and this case will remain closed.
BY YOUNGE, J.
Abira Medical Laboratories LLC
v. Transportation Insurance Company, Inc.; 24-441; The
foregoing reasons, Defendant�s Motion to Strike is Granted.
BY SLOMSKY, J.
Barbor et al v. State Farm Fire
and Casualty Company; 24-521; The foregoing reasons, the Motion to Dismiss
Count II of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 18) will be granted. The
Court will dismiss Count II of the Second Amended Complaint without prejudice.
Plaintiffs shall file a Third Amended Complaint, if deemed appropriate,
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) by August 20, 2024.
BY LEESON, JR., J.
Burgess v. Reading Parking Authority; 23-3390; The reasons set forth above, the Motion to Dismiss is denied
in part and granted in part. Burgess�s claims are dismissed without prejudice
for failure to state a claim.