\Court of Appeals

NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINIONS FILED

APRIL 26 2024

BY FREEMAN, J.

USA v. Timothy Streitmatter; 23-1339; judgment of the district court affirmed.

District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

APRIL 25, 2024

BY SURRICK, J.

LE v. Methacton School District; 20-2096; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs� Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

BY MURPHY, J.

Lang v. Springfield School District; 22-4042; For the reasons discussed above, the District�s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

BY WOLSON, J.

Holloway, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.; 23-0404; Mr. Holloway�s claims don�t have any connection to his relationship with Citibank.

BY BAYLSON, J.

Exp Realty, LLC et al v. Borough of Glenolden et al; 23-4287; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants� Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) are granted without prejudice.

BY McHUGH, J.

Gilbert v. Mallios; 24-1387; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Mr. Gilbert leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his Complaint for failure to state a claim.

APRIL 26, 2024

BY PEREZ, J.

Walls v. Miller Edge, Inc. et al; 22-3596; Defendants� Motion is denied with respect to Counts II and III with respect to Defendants Miller Edge and John Caggiano.

BY PAPPERT, J.

Painadath v. Good Shepherd Penn Partners; 22-3604; Painadath�s apparent, purported hostile work environment claim based on national origin discrimination also survives for now.

BY SURRICK, J.

Reid v. Hyppolite et al; 22-3645; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff�s Motion will be denied.

BY CARLOS, J.

Nautilus Insurance Company v. Liu Construction, LLC; 22-4936; For the reasons explained above, Nautilus� motion for default judgment is granted.

BY BEETLESTONE, J.

USA v. Savage., et al; 23-0454; Because the search warrant was supported by probable cause, and Byrd has not made a �substantial preliminary showing� that the supporting affidavit contained material falsehoods or omissions, his motion will be denied.

BY BAYLSON, J.

USA v. Barger et al; 24-0014; If, as the trial approaches, it appears that the Government�s evidence against Barger and Kane is likely to be highly prejudicial against Johnson, even though he is charged with relatively minor and different charges than against Barger and Kane, this Court will revisit the issue of severance, prior to the start of trial.