\Court of Appeals
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINIONS FILED
APRIL 26 2024
BY FREEMAN, J.
USA v. Timothy Streitmatter;
23-1339; judgment of the district court affirmed.
District Court
MEMORANDA AND ORDERS
APRIL 25, 2024
BY SURRICK, J.
LE v. Methacton School
District; 20-2096; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs� Motion will be
granted in part and denied in part.
BY MURPHY, J.
Lang v. Springfield School District; 22-4042; For the
reasons discussed above, the District�s motion for summary judgment is granted
in part and denied in part.
BY WOLSON, J.
Holloway, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.; 23-0404; Mr. Holloway�s
claims don�t have any connection to his relationship with Citibank.
BY BAYLSON, J.
Exp Realty, LLC et al v.
Borough of Glenolden et al; 23-4287; For the foregoing reasons, Defendants�
Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) are
granted without prejudice.
BY McHUGH, J.
Gilbert v. Mallios; 24-1387; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Mr. Gilbert
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his
Complaint for failure to state a claim.
APRIL 26, 2024
BY PEREZ, J.
Walls v. Miller Edge, Inc. et al; 22-3596; Defendants�
Motion is denied with respect to Counts II and III with respect to Defendants
Miller Edge and John Caggiano.
BY PAPPERT, J.
Painadath v. Good Shepherd Penn
Partners; 22-3604; Painadath�s apparent, purported
hostile work environment claim based on national origin discrimination also
survives for now.
BY SURRICK, J.
Reid v. Hyppolite et al;
22-3645; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff�s Motion
will be denied.
BY CARLOS, J.
Nautilus Insurance Company v. Liu Construction, LLC;
22-4936; For the reasons explained above, Nautilus�
motion for default judgment is granted.
BY BEETLESTONE, J.
USA v. Savage., et al; 23-0454; Because the search
warrant was supported by probable cause, and Byrd has not made a �substantial
preliminary showing� that the supporting affidavit contained material
falsehoods or omissions, his motion will be denied.
BY BAYLSON, J.
USA v. Barger et al; 24-0014; If, as the trial
approaches, it appears that the Government�s evidence against Barger and Kane
is likely to be highly prejudicial against Johnson, even though he is charged
with relatively minor and different charges than against Barger and Kane, this
Court will revisit the issue of severance, prior to the start of trial.