District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

JANUARY 09, 2025

BY SANCHEZ, J.

Moore v. Department of Corrections et al; 21-2695; Accordingly, the motion to dismiss will be granted, and Moore�s present-injury ETS exposure claim against Ms. Durand will be dismissed.

BY STRAW, J.

Estelle M v. Carolyn W. Colvin; 23-2906; Substantial evidence supports the ALJ�s findings regarding the three challenged domains of functioning. For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff�s request for review is denied.

BY HODGE, J.

Amres Corporation v. Nextres LLC et al; 24-0824; For the reasons set forth herein along with the reasons articulated by the Court during oral argument, the Court grants the Motion to dismiss.

BY PAPPERT, J.

Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company v. Mercado et al; 24-1089; As Liberty Mutual has no duty to defend Mercado, it has no duty to indemnify him.

BY QUINONES, J.

Robinson v. Integrated Deicing Services; 24-5112; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his Complaint, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

BY GALLAGHER, J.

Jenkins v. Ciocca Management, Inc.; 23-5115; For the foregoing reasons, Defendant�s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

JANUARY 10, 2025

BY HODGE, J.

Ogilvie v. Summa Global Education; 23-4884; For the reasons stated above, Defendant�s Motion to Dismiss Count V, Count VI, and Count VII is granted.

BY WOLSON, J.

Rivera v. Transunion LLC; 24-0333; Ms. Rivera has not stated a claim, so I will dismiss her Second Amended Complaint.

BY SLOMSKY, J.

Abira Medical Laboratories LLC v. Freedom Life Insurance Company of America; 24-2110; For the foregoing reasons, Defendant�s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff�s First Amended Complaint will be granted.

BY WOLSON, J.

Benson et al v. Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLC et al; 24-3467; I will, however, permit Mr. Benson to file a second amended complaint if he believes that he can address the issues that I have identified.

BY SCOTT, J.

Woltz v. Good et al; 24-6702; The Court cannot permit the continued expenditure of scarce judicial resources to adjudicate Woltz�s meritless attempts to invoke federal jurisdiction to prevent his eviction under state procedures.

BY BAYLSON, J.

Detty v. Beck et al; 24-6736; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Detty leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his Complaint.

BY PAPPERT, J.

USA v. Turra et al; 97-0359; Indeed, Davis�s conduct has apparently worsened recently, as he has incurred four infractions in the last year.