District Court

MEMORANDA AND ORDERS

JANUARY 03, 2025

BY SANCHEZ, J.

USA v. Perez; 03-0554; Finally, for the reasons discussed in the preceding section, see infra at 8-9, the Court is not persuaded a sentence reduction is consistent with the relevant � 3553(a) factors, including the �the nature and circumstances of the offense.�

BY GOLDBERG, J.

George v. Piedmont Airlines, Inc.; 23-3939; Defendant�s motion to dismiss for insufficient subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) must therefore be granted, and the case dismissed.

BY BARTLE, J.

Taylor v. County of Chester et al; 23-4031; Accordingly, his motion for leave to file a second amended complaint will be denied.

BY YOUNGE, J.

Graham v. Fema et al; 23-4294; Graham will be given the opportunity to file an amended complaint to reallege the claims that have been dismissed without prejudice.

BY ALEJANDRO, J.

Ball v. Angellucci et al; 24-5577; For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Ball leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss his Complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

BY BARTLE, J.

Creasey v. Hydro Extrusion USA, LLC; 24-6458; Accordingly this action will be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c).

BY COSTELLO, J.

Poussaint v. Rittenhouse School APTS, LLC et al; 25-0001; For the reasons stated, this case is dismissed. No leave to amend will be granted.

BY DIAMOND, J.

Stewart v. Wade et al; 22-1379; For these reasons, I will enter Judgment in favor of Defendants Sara McMullen, Clinton Probst, and Damien Mscisz, and against Plaintiff Ian Stewart.

BY YOUNGE, J.

Ellis v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al; 24-6741; For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Ellis leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).